Blindfolded and unbiased in the marble you seem!
Yet, in real life, can you ever level your tilted
scale!  
 Can two faces meet,
when two heads are turning away?
Two torsos pulling in opposite directions
Two hands, yet hoping to shake and greet!
But tell me oh miraculous one!
Can your scale of justice be kept at balance, in this world
of inequality! 
In a world where existence is inequality! 
And inequality is existence! 
From night and day, to food and water 
Unequal are properties 
Unequal are qualities 
Unequal are resources 
Unequal capability; unequal availability 
Yet, what equality can you claim; when you claim justice! 
 Justice is fairness;
and fairness is justice; once said Rawls 
Equal rights for basic liberties he says 
But who decides the scales of the basic!
Greatest advantage to the least advantaged, he says 
But, what qualities do you choose 
When conflicts arise, with multiple choices! 
Many are disadvantaged, based on many a different property 
Which one of the many will one choose?  
With limited resources and multiples of disadvantaged 
On what basis does one comparatively distribute? 
Can one compare pain with poverty? 
Can one compare hunger with disease? 
Who can compare; and who can choose! 
Can anyone be just- when he can just choose? 
The Rawlsian veil of ignorance; hiding its inherent quality
With reasoning minds  
and rational beings
Within the cosy fair comfort of the original position 
Even to an omniscient man, with omnipotent capability 
Are they not finer points of imagination?
The hard problem of justice is real; and when its reality
strikes you
It strikes you hard as a rugged rock 
To chisel into this,  justice must deal with the rocky reality of
the real man 
The shrewd man next door; the unkempt man round the corner!
The man within; still grappling with greed hate and delusion!
The man with a preference for us over them; family over
friend; friend over stranger 
A preference for the known over the unknown
A preference for the fearsome over the fearful; more over
the less 
With limited resources and limited facility 
With Limited   man’s
cognitive capability 
Can any real system of man,  ever be Just!
 Upholding the hands
of justice on the Indian ground
Nyaya and Niti have long been around!
Tested and tried to be sound
Nyaya and Niti are wisdom profound! 
Nyaya aims at fairness; Niti goes by the rule   
Niti is human society’s only protective tool
Protecting the powerless from the powerful
Limiting the reign of power; and setting the rule of
security 
Nyaya on the other hand is of implementation
Nyaya is of practise : Nyaya is considerate 
Nyaya is comparative; Nyaya is compassionate  
To be effective and just in, wisdom and action  
Nyaya and niti  must  go hand in hand 
Nyaya and niti;  hand
in hand  to control power 
Aiming to restore equal opportunity, in world of inequality 
Striving for equanimity, protecting the weaker from the
stronger 
Nyaya and niti  
ultimately aim at balancing power!
But to handle power and balance it , one must accept its
inherent  responsibility 
For the hard handle of Power is attached broad basket of
responsibility 
The Power to utilize; brings in responsibility to conserve
The power to access; brings in responsibility to share 
The power to influence; brings in the responsibly to be
truthful 
The power to distribute; bring in the responsibility to be
fair 
Responsibility produces motivation 
Motivation produces the will 
The Will produces action 
And If action is non violent and the will is good 
And motivation is devoid of greed hate and delusion 
Action tends towards the ideal !
And the ideal tends towards the idea!
The ideal idea ;  the
idea of justice! 
Tell me friend!  Is
this not a pragmatic solution?
Only a pragmatic solution to the mere idea of justice!  

References
ReplyDelete1.Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3.2006, Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
4.Amartya Sen (2009). The Idea of Justice: Penguin books
5. A Conceptual-Analytic Study Of Classical Indian Philosophy Of Morals(2006) Rajendra Prasad